{"id":2112,"date":"2007-04-08T02:13:16","date_gmt":"2007-04-08T02:13:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/?p=2112"},"modified":"2007-04-08T02:13:16","modified_gmt":"2007-04-08T02:13:16","slug":"2007-4-8-liberation-through-shopping-html","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/?p=2112","title":{"rendered":"Liberation through shopping"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-src=\"v5\">Ever since I read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/04\/05\/fashion\/05MUSLIM.html?ex=1333425600&#038;en=ea3b4f4a8390ec9a&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">this<\/a> New York Times article a few days back about the identitarian fashion issues of Muslim American women I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out <em>exactly<\/em> what bothers me about it. It&#8217;s not just the article&#8217;s utter naivet\u00c3\u00a9 (the New York Times discovers that Muslim women&#8211;even veiled ones&#8211;care about fashion!) or the trite dichotomies it sets up. Here&#8217;s the lead, for example: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>For Aysha Hussain, getting dressed each day is a fraught negotiation. Ms. Hussain, a 24-year-old magazine writer in New York, is devoted to her pipe-stem Levi\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s and determined to incorporate their brash modernity into her wardrobe while adhering to the tenets of her Muslim faith. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(Wow, get it? Pipe-stem Levi&#8217;s = &#8220;brash modernity.&#8221; Muslim faith = the opposite.)<\/p>\n<p>And it&#8217;s not just that it seems to be trying to turn a pretty mundane observation (what a Muslim woman chooses to wear \u00e2\u20ac\u0153is a critical part of her identity,&#8221; says one interviewee) into a sociological phenomenon that is unique to Muslim women. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s mostly the way the article seems to subscribe to a &#8220;liberation through shopping&#8221; theory. The title is &#8220;We, Myself and I.&#8221; Presumably, in the outfits of the Muslim women interviewed, the &#8220;we&#8221; is exemplified by the veil and the modest long sleeves, and the &#8220;myself&#8221; by the brash, modern touches of Western coutoure. Theres&#8217; no questioning of the assumption that fashion and consumerism do anything but allow the individual woman to express herself. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div data-src=\"v5\">Ever since I read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/04\/05\/fashion\/05MUSLIM.html?ex=1333425600&#038;en=ea3b4f4a8390ec9a&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">this<\/a> New York Times article a few days back about the identitarian fashion issues of Muslim American women I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out <em>exactly<\/em> what bothers me about it. It&#8217;s not just the article&#8217;s utter naivet\u00c3\u00a9 (the New York Times discovers that Muslim women&#8211;even veiled ones&#8211;care about fashion!) or the trite dichotomies it sets up. Here&#8217;s the lead, for example:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>For Aysha Hussain, getting dressed each day is a fraught negotiation. Ms. Hussain, a 24-year-old magazine writer in New York, is devoted to her pipe-stem Levi\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s and determined to incorporate their brash modernity into her wardrobe while adhering to the tenets of her Muslim faith. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(Wow, get it? Pipe-stem Levi&#8217;s = &#8220;brash modernity.&#8221; Muslim faith = the opposite.)<br \/>\nAnd it&#8217;s not just that it seems to be trying to turn a pretty mundane observation (what a Muslim woman chooses to wear \u00e2\u20ac\u0153is a critical part of her identity,&#8221; says one interviewee) into a sociological phenomenon that is unique to Muslim women.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s mostly the way the article seems to subscribe to a &#8220;liberation through shopping&#8221; theory. The title is &#8220;We, Myself and I.&#8221; Presumably, in the outfits of the Muslim women interviewed, the &#8220;we&#8221; is exemplified by the veil and the modest long sleeves, and the &#8220;myself&#8221; by the brash, modern touches of Western coutoure. Theres&#8217; no questioning of the assumption that fashion and consumerism do anything but allow the individual woman to express herself.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[102,194,13],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2112"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2112\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amrani.cc\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}