The CPJ has details on the case here. Note that charges also include offending Muslims.
Needless to say, this is a rather sad time for Morocco as this charge comes soon after lawsuits were launched against two journalists late last month for publishing leaked security documents, the first Nichane case earlier this year in which two journalists were given suspended sentences for “insulting Islam” and the forced departure of AbouBakr Jamai, perhaps the most courageous Moroccan journalist, from the country.
It’s hard not to agree with my favorite Moroccan blogger, Larbi, who says:
J’arrive à l’évidence suivante: le Maroc a opté pour une politique de la peur visant à faire taire tous ceux qui sortent du moule habituel. Il ramène tout à la « haute trahison» là où il y a de simples opinions personnelles. Il cadre, aujourd’hui plus que jamais, la pensée et définie son champ d’exercice. Il n’en finit pas de multiplier les intimidations et les contraintes. Ancré dans ses certitudes, il ne supporte pas le regard différent de certains de ses citoyens, interdit leurs questionnements, rejette leurs colères. Il les veut tous semblables, alignés sur la même pensée, roulants à la même cadence, conformes au même modèle modélisant . De ce fait, il est plus proche d’un pays totalitaire du tiers-monde, et peut être il l’est, que d’un pays qui aspire à la démocratie. C’est triste, c’est vraiment triste. Je dis NON à cette politique de peur. Nous ne cèderons pas !
My translation: I’ve come to the following conclusion: Morocco has opted for a politics of fear aiming to silence all of those who don’t fit the official mold. It speaks of “high treason” when dealing with simple personal opinions. It frames, today more than ever, critical thinking and limits where it can be exercised. It forever multiplies threats and constraints. Anchored in its beliefs, it cannot bear the critical examination of its citizens, forbids their questioning, rejects their angers. It wants them all the same, aligned on the same frequency, moving at the same rhythm, conforming to the same model. In this regard, it is closer to a totalitarian country in the third-world — and perhaps it is one — than a country that aspires to democracy. It’s sad, it’s really sad. I say NO to this politics of fear. We will not concede.
The king should fire the guy who wrote this idiotic speech. Perhaps the guy responsible for this charade is the one pushing for persecution of the writer who exposed his idiocy.
It appeared that the king was trying to advance two contradicting points (elections are important and you, my dear subjects, should participate in it; yet all the strategic objectives and the frame of action are decided by an unelected person, that is my royal highness).