Four detainees released; 21 others given 15 more days

I honestly don’t understand how this country works anymore. After extending their detention Sunday for 15 more days, the State Security Prosecutor U-turned this afternoon, ordering the release of two leftist women activists, Nada al-Qassass and Rasha 3azab.

The two women journalists were arrested on May 7, together with Asmaa Ali of the Revolutionary Socialists, whose release the prosecutor ordered yesterday. The two women are still in Qanater Women’s Prison, and are expected to go free tomorrow. (Mabrouk ya banat!!)

The State Security Prosecutor also ordered today the release of Ashraf Ibrahim and Hamdi Abul Ma3ati Qenawi, while extending the detention of 21 other activists—including Kamal Khalil, Ibrahim el-Sahari and Wael Khalil, who’ve been in prison since April 26-27—for another 15 more days.More...

Ashraf Ibrahim was one of the hunger-strikers who were forcefully moved last week to solitary confinement in Mazra3et Tora prison. The hunger strike lasted for five days, with more than a dozen detainees taking part. Ashraf and four other detainees were transferred by a Special Operations police force, attached to Tora, against their will. The detainees’ lawyers say the remaining four, after Ashraf’s release, were returned to their original cells in Mahkoum Tora.

3alaa Seif al-Islam, a prominent leftist blogger whose detention was renewed yesterday for another 15 days, sent a letter from prison today. My friend Alia Mossallam kindly translated it into English: Continue reading Four detainees released; 21 others given 15 more days

Wadis have loose sediment (13)

June 6, 2006

Last Saturday, I went to see a mass grave.

I have to say that ranked up there with one of the more disturbing experiences, if just for some its mundane details. We were flown out there by the Americans to some god forsaken spot in the middle of the desert early in the morning. When we arrived we were taken into a large air-conditioned tent, rather like half a cylinder with a long table inside and a fridge full of cold water and this lean spare man, “Sonny” proceeded to give us a briefing on… well how people kill other people.

Iraq you see, is underlain by a stratum of gypsum, a hard chalky substance that makes digging difficult. As a result, if you need to bury someone quickly, you need to find a place where the soil is loose.

“All humans operate on a least effort system, especially murderers,” he said and then proceeded to explain in fairly complicated geologic terms how sediment builds up in desert wadis (dry riverbeds) making them ideal places to dig graves.

Sonny has been doing this work for 30 years, he’s done mass graves in Kosovo, searched for American MIA remains in Cambodia and Vietnam, helped excavate an African American slave burial ground in Manhattan just a few years ago. He’s weirdly familiar with the mechanics of mass murder.

Deeper wadis also provide two high walls to contain people in while you stand above and open fire. The trenches are dug with a front loader. One end of the trench is usually deeper than the other because of the mechanism of the shovel…

The string of meaningless details flowed over us as the guy from the New York Times and I took notes.

And then they took us to the site itself and suddenly we all fell silent because it so much more awful than we expected. I had thought bones, I had thought a clinical sort of exercise, I thought excavations.

What I saw was a figure in a blue dish dash arched its back, its skeletal jaw open to the sky with hands tied behind its back and a blindfold across the eye sockets. And there were more, 28 to be precise. The details jumped out, a watch, a sandal, a cheap plastic shoe, the remnant of a sweater beneath a dish dash, and everywhere skulls with blindfolds.

It seemed almost ludicrous, like someone had dressed them up in some strange Day of the Dead parody-skeletons shouldn’t have clothes, skeletons don’t need blindfolds, they don’t have eyes!

I was there with a guy from the NYT and a Reuters photographer, afterwards, separately we murmured to each other, “have you seen something like this before?” each assuming the other had somehow experienced it before – after all Iraq was a good spot for them. None of us had.

And so we asked questions and the answers weren’t much fun. Were they killed here? And the answers came with the technical detail that only a forensic archeologist can provide.

“The AK-47 ejects its cartridges at a 45 degree angle forward and judging by the 80 some cartridges gathered here,” he pointed to a collection of little red flags fluttering in the breeze, “the shooter would have stood here as he fired. Notice how the bodies fell in that direction.”

Kerry Grant, an Australian archeologist who did the excavation on this site, added “we think by the state of many of the skulls” she pointed at a particularly splintered specimen “they went around and shot people in the head afterwards.”

In 1991, The US-led coalition in Desert Storm smashed the Iraqi army and drove it out of Kuwait. The Shiites in the south revolted and rapidly took control of most of the south, the US, fearing Iranian influence, did not come to their aid.

The Iraqi army regrouped and went after the Shiites with a vengeance. Some 100,000, if not more were killed. But as Sonny explained, these were not the well planned mass graves of the campaigns against the Kurds in the 1980s, which he also excavated.

The Kurds, men, women, children, were shipped off in a very well planned, methodical campaign where whole villages were put on a bus, taken to a site, killed and dumped into mass graves holding hundreds.

For the Shiites it was a fast, haphazard affair of a few dozen at a time, taken out into the desert, killed, buried, before the next group was brought along.

We went to a second site, more what I would have expected, where the bodies had just been shot dead in a ravine that periodically ran with water so that it was just shreds of clothes and bits of bone scattered along the bottom.

The floor of the wadi was filled with the same gaily colored flags fluttering in the breeze marking the locations of clothes, bits of bone, cartridge casings and spent bullets.

Mike Smith, an American, was running this site, and he enthusiastically explained the contour mapping they’d done on the site to know exactly how the remains were being carried away by the water.

Mike is also an archeologist and worked once at Harappa, the 3000 BC ruins in the Indus River Valley civilization in Pakistan. Wouldn’t you rather be doing that instead? He admitted that flying above Iraq, he’d look down and think, gee that’s Babylon and no one’s done any excavation here since the 1980s.

Maybe some other time.

Sonny guessed there were 10-12 bodies from this site, but they won’t know until they take everything to lab in Baghdad, where they have an expert at “co-mingled” bodies separate everything out.

Sonny says this is the best equipped mass graves operation he’s ever seen. The 11 member team lives in a camp guarded by an 80 member security team, with another dozen people doing food, maintenance, etc…

There’s a high tech lab in Baghdad analyzing everything, figuring out the ballistics and angle of the bullet all in preparation for the court case, when Saddam is tried for the 1991 uprising. Though that case has to wait until the current one for the 1982 massacre of 150 Shiites in Dujail to finish, after which he will be tried for the Anfal campaign against the Kurds, just to name a few of the other numerous cases the US-assisted court has planned.

The US is underwriting one of the most sophisticated crime analysis labs in the world to prepare half a dozen cases against Saddam.

Now think on this. The day after I came back, they found 20 corpses in various spots around Baghdad, that’s roughly the number of bodies in the first site I saw. The next day 10 bodies were found in Baghdad, including four floating in the Tigris, that’s the number of bodies in the second site.

That’s not even counting the 30-50 people dying daily in the violence.

There is the equivalent of a new mass grave dying in Iraq every day.

Supersize it

“I’m loving it!” Who remember that MacDonald’s campaign? Seems, according to an Egypt Today piece, that the good people down at the Ministry of Tourism do.
They’ve come up with their own version, a campaign that is going to change the way Egyptians deal with tourists.

It seems that someone at the ministry noticed that a lot of tourists leave Egypt with a bad taste in their mouths, perhaps even the impression that they have been ripped-off during their visit. (I wonder whose cousin got the contract to do the heavy lifting on this insightful piece of analysis?)

Apparently the solution is to “educate� the “less educated, the less socially conscious� types who overcharge tourists and don’t treat them as nicely as perhaps they feel they deserve.

Not to confuse these simple folk, they have designed a nice simple little ad for them, the story explains.

“… they kept the concept simple. The first series of print and television ads take the one-pound note — with its picture of Abu Simbel — and asks the Egyptian if he’s ever really looked at it. The camera zooms in on the monument, which slowly vanishes, leaving the paper almost entirely blank. “Hopefully, visually portraying the one-pound note with and without tourism drives the message home the pound would just not be the same,� Mustafa says.�

Later stages apparently will teach personal grooming.

Egypt Today is anodyne by necessity. They can’t afford to say anything that might annoy a potential advertiser or ministry contact, so I guess we can excuse the passive reproduction of this patronizing muddle-speak. The implication that Egyptians need MacDonald’s-style service training has got to rub some people the wrong way, however.

How can you tell an educated, socially conscious person? He’s the one who smiles at the foreigner, the one who speaks a little English. Maybe he’ll have on a hair net as well.

The best part is at the end, however. This is where the “communications consultant� from the ministry gets all sweaty about the Orwellian angle. “The investment in a national effort like this should stem from everyone’s sense of corporate social responsibility,� she is quoted as saying, and then as being “hopeful� for legislative changes: “Sometimes you have to change laws and regulations to get people not to do things…�

So, while one section of the regime has guys in polyester shirts beating demonstrators and shoving rolled up cardboard up their butts, another is going to pass a law that bans frowning at foreigners.

At the end of the day, it’s just not enough any more to lay there and take it, you gotta smile nicely for the tourists as well.

Solidarity demo in London

Around 30 protestors assembled yesterday in front of the BBC World Service building in London, to express their solidarity with their Cairo colleagues, Dina Samak and Dina Gameel, who were assaulted by security agents and plainclothes thugs, on 25 May, 2006. The demo was called for by the British National Union of Journalists, to which the two Egyptian journalists belong. You can find a full report on Ahmad Zahran’s blog.

The British Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematograph and Theatre Union (BECTU) has also sent a letter to the Egyptian Prosecutor-General, Maher 3abdel Wahed, condemning the assaults on journalists and protestors, and demanding the detainees’ release.. Continue reading Solidarity demo in London

Trouble ahead

So Bush wants a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. You know that means things are even more fucked up than we know with US policy the Middle East. If he ever calls for a constitutional ban on abortion, I predict global nuclear warfare.

On a related note: Robert Kennedy Jr. in this month’s Rolling Stone becomes the second prominent personality to allege the 2004 presidential election was stolen in the mainstream media. The first, as far as I know, was our old contrarian friend Christopher Hitchens in Vanity Fair.

Engineering dissent

I can’t claim I know much about what’s happening in the Engineers’ Syndicate, but it seems like the Egyptian engineers are trying to get their act together, and liberate their syndicate from government control. The syndicate, together with other professional syndicates—especially the Doctors’, Pharmacists’—had largely fallen under the Muslim Brothers’ control in the beginning of the 1990s. The government targeted the syndicates with new legislations, that brought them under its control, during the general crackdown on Islamism starting from 1992. Activities at the syndicate came to a complete halt for a decade.

But, it seems the overall political stir in the country is finally making its way to our engineers. Last year my inbox received several statements signed by Mohandessoun Ded el-Herassa, which translates awkwardly into “Engineers Against Custodianship,” in reference to the government-imposed group of custodians who run the syndicate. And if I’m not mistaken, there was a demonstration organized at some point in front of the syndicate this year, but my memory betrays me so as to when exactly.

It’s worth noting several prominent leaders in the anti-Mubarak movement come from the ranks of the engineers, like Kamal Khalil. But leftist engineers, seemingly, have tended to be active politically in circles other than their own syndicate. I don’t necessarily know why, but may be because of the strong dominance of the Islamists that had left a tiny room for secular activism? (If any of you dear Arabist readers are following the engineers’ beat, you are more than welcome to share info with us.)

Since last February, my inbox has been receiving statements signed by the “Democratic Engineers.� Now a petition is being circulated calling for the end of government control on the syndicate. I thought of sharing their (Arabic) website with you. The site includes their manifesto, statements, updates on activism issues, and the petition.

How Israel treats foreign NGO workers

Here’s a couple of recent stories about what happened to Western aid workers operating in the Occupied Territories. Of course, the Rachel Corrie episode showed how Israel feels about Westerners trying to help Palestinians.

Ayaz Ali of Islamic Relief:

Ayaz Ali returned from Israel to Britain last week after a military judge ruled he had done nothing wrong. On his release, the Israeli government issued a statement accusing Ali, 35, of assisting Hamas and implied that he was a neo-Nazi and a supporter of al-Qaeda.

. . .

Every day he was taken to an interrogation room to be questioned for up to 14 hours under bright lights by agents of Israel’s internal security agency, Shin Bet, while handcuffed and shackled to a chair. When his interrogators deemed he was being co-operative, his handcuffs were removed; they were replaced when they believed he was not helpful.

‘They were brilliant at playing mind games. They said they knew everything about me and they had been watching me for five months. They knew my wife was expecting a baby, and told me I would never see my baby. I just tried to be completely honest,’ Ali said.

The interrogations were led by an aggressive man who was assisted by others who played a sympathetic role. ‘He told me that if he thought I was an imminent threat or knew about an imminent threat, he was prepared to kill me. I was in fear for my life,’ he said.

Maureen Murphy of Al Haq:

In the late afternoon of 28 May 2005, Al-Haq human rights defender and American citizen Maureen Murphy arrived at Ben Gurion airport in Israel, on her way back from the USA to Ramallah in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). She was questioned, denied entry into Israel, declared persona non grata and deported on a plane at 00:55 am on 29 May.

Israeli lawyer Smadar Ben-Natan went to see Maureen at the airport and petitioned for an interim injunction to prevent the deportation. The petition was denied by Judge Nurit Akhituv, via phone, at 00:40. The formal basis on which Maureen was denied entry and deported was immigration. The Israeli authorities allegedly feared that Maureen was attempting to settle illegally in Israel. The lawyer’s argument that Ramallah is not in Israel, but rather in the OPT, was discarded. However, there is no way to enter the West Bank without passing through Israeli border control since the Israeli occupation authorities do not allow the operation of any airports inside the West Bank.

Maureen has no intention of settling in Israel. Her intention is to assist Al-Haq in its work defending human rights in the OPT. Maureen’s case is emblematic of an increasing pattern of international human rights defenders being denied access to the OPT. Al-Haq is gravely concerned that this will deprive local human rights organisations of their ability to recruit the people of their choice in order to best monitor, document and expose human rights violations in the OPT.

NYT on Zaha Hadid

This NYT piece on Zaha Hadid could have done with a bit more research on the years she spent as a purely “theoretical” architect, and the sometimes controverisial work she finally built in recent years, but it’s nice to see Zaha Hadid getting this praise. I remember not living far from her in London in the 1990s, how she despaired of ever actually building anything, and how she was probably the world’s most famous Iraqi after Saddam.

The Egyptian ADSL black market

If you have ever looked up to the sky while walking around in a Cairo mid- or lower income neighborhood, you must have seen a net of white cables above you, coming out of a window on one side of the street, stretching to balconies and windows on the other side, some fifteen meters above street level: A business-minded resident subscribes to a 1 Mb connection, and then informally rents out connectivity to his neighbors. 

I recently spoke to an executive of a leading ISP in Egypt, and he estimated that no less then 40% of all ADSL lines in Egypt are shared between apartments, which technically is illegal. Sometimes the number of sub-subscribers can reach up to 50 people.

 

The problem for ISPs is that people call and complain about services who are not their customers. They thus would like to legalize this black market by being allowed to offer multi-party contracts (which would also bring legal protection to the actual subscribers who are now held accountable for whatever their neighbors are doing on the web). But the government appears to be hesitating.

I find it interesting to see how creative Egyptians are in distribution when the offer doesn’t suit market conditions for whatever reason (while the government two years ago brought prices down, the market would now be big enough for prices to further decline, but the government keeps them up in order to protect smaller ISP from being driven out of the market).

A similar thing happens in the mobile market, where operators in vain kept trying to introduce packages where you buy both a mobile and a line at the same time. But distributors would in most cases tear them apart and sell both separately anyways to better tune their offers to the market.

The next round is coming up, as one of the operators is about to import handsets and SIM cards that via a code system can only be used together.

Â