CBS’ 60 Minutes on Palestine

This has been much talked about in the last few days, and I have just caught up with it and watched it. The incredible, unprecedented thing about this documentary is that it takes the time to examine the living conditions of Palestinians, the nasty mindedness of the settler movement and Israel’s policy of supporting it. All of this is public knowledge for those who care to look for it, the big deal here is that for those who don’t care, just turned on the TV, are ill-informed, a US broadcaster has just shown a straight-up account of the occupation of Palestine that is not automatically followed by a “Israel says this, Palestinians say that” idiocy or a reaffirmation of “Israel’s right to defend itself.” So yes, it’s a big deal.

Watch on the CBS website (can be difficult with low-speed internet), or YouTube (part 1, part 2) and then take the time to thanks CBS for having given the settlement issue a fair hearing.

Links for January 28th

Links from my del.icio.us account for January 28th:

Obama’s TV appearance

A very few quick notes on Obama’s appearance on Arabiya TV:

– Very good on the Obama team to have made this move, which was necessary, so quickly.
– It repairs some, but only some, of the damage caused by his silence on Gaza.
– The choice of Arabiya was most probably a decision to appeal to the Saudis, have Obama underline the importance of their Arab Initiative which has been snubbed by Israel and the US under Bush.
– Nonetheless Arabiya is problematic – this is the channel dubbed Hibriya (The Hebrew One) because of its coverage of the Gaza crisis and that generally defends the views of Riyadh, Cairo and other problematic US allies. This confirms that Obama will not, like Bush since 2006, go against Egypt and Saudi on domestic issues and there won’t be a rethink of the US relationship with these. But if you thought that would happen, you’re stupid.
– Should Obama have gone to Jazeera instead? Perhaps not, for both domestic reasons (the criticism he would expose himself to, even if unwarranted) and because there are genuine US complaints about Jazeera. But at some later point, he should go to Jazeera – especially if it is to pitch a major conflict resolution initiative in the region. At the end of the day, despite its bias, Arabiya is the number two pan-Arab stations. (In many countries, like the rest of the world, Arabs actually watch their national TV stations most.)
– Obama’s next move should be to disband al-Hurra. It’s a useless waste of money.
– Obama’s line that the US should “start by listening” will be taken (along with the phone calls) with enormous pleasure by Egyptian diplomats, among others, who felt that the advice of Arab allies was ignored under Bush.
– I am also disturbed at why an American president would say Israel’s security is “paramount” – as in more important than anything? Why should it be? Why not say it’s a “red line” in the grand old style of Arab leaders?
– What this says (as much as this kind of interview can say anything deep) is that the Obama approach compared to Bush, for now, is more active and tough on Iran, same on Israel but more involved on peace process, Forward Agenda for Freedom is dropped because conflict resolution and managing Iran is more important, and greater attention to communication issues.

The professional analysis is of course at Marc Lynch’s blog, here and here. Juan Cole has the interview and transcript. Update: Another take here.

Regarding the issue of Hillary Clinton’s “Israel’s right to defend itself” comment, I think the US should stop using this formulation. Why not instead say, “did Hamas expect Israel to do nothing as it launched rockets?” Obviously I’d like to see some serious concern, repeatedly voiced, for the IDF’s behavior in Gaza and the disproportionality of the conflict.

Links January 26th to January 27th

Links from my del.icio.us account for January 26th through January 27th:

L’Humanite account of cold-blooded murder of children in Gaza

We are seeing more testimonies like this one (but of course mostly in the left-wing press, in this case the Communist newspaper L’Humanité in France):

En mars dernier lors d’une énième incursion dans la bande de Gaza, l’armée israélienne avait fouillé les maisons puis avait continuer son chemin, vers Jabaliya. La famille Abed Rabbo (d’où le nom du lieu), occupait l’ensemble des petits immeubles qui se trouvaient là. Quand l’offensive a commencé, les Abed Rabbo étaient sur leurs gardes, mais pas plus inquiets que ça. Ce qui peut sembler étrange pour qui ne vit pas le quotidien de ces Palestiniens, soumis au bon vouloir des Israéliens. En mars dernier, par exemple, ils avaient fait une incursion dans la bande de Gaza en passant par le hameau. Ils s’étaient contentés d’une fouille des habitations et avaient passé leur chemin. « C’est pourquoi tout le monde pensait que ça allait être la même chose cette fois-ci », explique Khaled, 30 ans. Lui se trouvait avec sa famille au rez-de-chaussée d’un immeuble dans lequel vivaient 27 personnes. Le 7 janvier, en milieu de matinée, les Israéliens sont arrivés. Ils ont installés un poste militaire. Les chars se sont mis en position derrière des buttes de sable alors que par hauts-parleurs ils intimaient l’ordre aux gens de sortir.

« Comme nous habitions au rez-de-chaussée, nous sommes sortis les premiers », raconte Khaled, la voix tremblante. « J’étais avec ma femme, nos trois filles et ma mère. J’avais un drapeau blanc. Sur le char, il y avait deux soldats. L’un mangeait des chips, l’autre du chocolat. On est resté comme ça pendant plus de 5 minutes, alignés. Personne ne nous disait rien. On ne savait pas quoi faire. Soudain un soldat est sorti du char. Il était roux et portait les papillotes des religieux. Il a tiré sur ma petite fille de 2 ans, Amal. Ses intestins sont sortis de son ventre. Puis il a visé en rafale celle de 7 ans, Sohad. Ma femme s’est évanouie. Il a tiré sur ma mère ». Summum du vice chez ce soldat, il n’a pas tué Khaled. Une ambulance se trouvait à proximité. « Ils ont fait descendre le chauffeur puis ont écrasé le véhicule avec un char », soutient Khaled Abed Rabbo. Les deux petites filles, Amal et Sohad, sont mortes. La troisième est grièvement blessée. Avec son frère et sa femme, Khaled les emmène, ainsi que la mère. Ils prennent la route non sans essuyer les tirs de snipers embusqués dans les maisons qui jouaient à leur faire peur en visant à côté. « Au rond-point, un homme a voulu nous aider avec sa carriole. Il s’appelait Hadnan Mekbel. Les Israéliens l’ont tué ainsi que son cheval. » Khaled sort son portable et montre ses filles dans un linceul. La troisième est dans un hôpital en Belgique. Elle est tétraplégique. Sa femme est dans un état de choc psychologique permanent Khaled ne peut pas oublier. Il revient tous les jours devant sa maison détruite. « C’est toute ma vie, mes souvenirs. Je vois mes enfants jouer autour de moi », dit-il. « C’était la maison du bonheur ».

Quick summary if you don’t speak French: Abed Rabbo’s family had dealt with Israeli soldiers before, in March 2008 during a brief Israeli incursion. Nothing had happened then, and they just expected a search of their house this time around. The Israelis made him and his family line up and wait as tanks lined up across them. Then a red-haired soldier sporting Haredim long locks came out of a tank, shot his 2-year old daughter Amal (“her guts spilled out of her stomach”) and then his 7-year-old daughter Sohad. They then destroyed a nearby ambulance, and when they found a man with a horse cart to help them, the man and his horse was shot. According to Rabbo, he and his wife (who is still under shock) were left alive and their daughters targeted and kept from medical care on purpose, to teach them a lesson. His third daughter was also shot (and will probably be disabled for life) and is receiving medical care in Belgium.

For a decade now there has been rising concern in Israel in the growing strength of the religious right among the armed forces, especially the transition from para-military youth movements to the IDF some young religious Israelis make, especially if they are from lower-income groups.

From the comments, more testimonies here.

Links January 25th to January 26th

Links from my del.icio.us account for January 25th through January 26th:

Links for January 25th

Links from my del.icio.us account for January 25th:

Waltz with Bashir

I went to see “Waltz with Bashir,” the Israeli, Oscar-nominated animated film about the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, with very mixed feelings. I’ve been curious to see the film since I first heard of it. Yet especially after the events of the last month I didn’t feel particularly inclined to give $12 to an Israeli project. And I feared the film would be an offensively self-centered view of the war, in which we are meant to sympathize with Israeli soldiers for the inhumanity they were forced to exercise and witness. But I told myself I should investigate.

Continue reading Waltz with Bashir

Links for January 24th

Links from my del.icio.us account for January 24th:

Links for January 24th

Links from my del.icio.us account for January 24th: