Islamist detainees

I bumped tonight into an Islamist lawyer I know who is a former member of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad. We chatted about several issues including Dr. Ayman al-Zawahri’s latest video, current political situation, and more importantly (for me) the issue of Islamist political detainees–those terror suspects who’ve been languishing in Egypt’s Gulags since the 1990s without trial.
The Egyptian Interior Ministry never gave figures for the number of prisoners and detainees. The figures for detainees in the 1990s, put by rights watchdogs, have drastically varied. EOHR puts it at 22,000. I heard other figures that went up to 40,000.

Last March, EOHR put the number of detainees at something between 16,000 and 18,000, due to the release of thousands of Gamaa Islamiya detainees with their renunciation of violence.

The Islamist lawyer I met tonight said there are currently from 5,000 to 6,000 Islamist detainees in prisons. According to him, the Gamaa’s detainees are roughly 600 only, while those of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad number 2,000, and the rest are a mixture of salafis, Sinai bombers’ suspects and a random bunch.

Of course I have no means to verify this independently.

Recommended Book:
Al-Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam

The liquid explosives plot

Being rather busy with work, I have paid rather scant attention to the “liquid explosives” airplane plot except to figure out how to carry all the expensive electronics I usually carry with me when I travel. I did hear, notably from people in Lebanon, many people express a fear that this is a diversionary tactic from the war on Lebanon and thus an invented plot. I have no idea about this, but when you get someone like Craig Murray, the courageous former British ambassador to Uzbekistan who revealed British collaboration with the rather nasty regime of Islam Karimov. What he has to say is quite revealing. (See also this MSNBC report.) I mean, none of the alleged terrorists had bought plane tickets and some of them didn’t even have passports! And it seems the US pressured the UK to arrest the suspects sooner rather than keep them under surveillance.

Targeted vituperation

Thanks to the often amusing Angry Arab for the link to a little light summertime reading, to whit to Norm Finkelstein’s latest rhetorical head butt to Alan Dershowitz.

Under the guise of taking apart Dershowitz’s political-legal analyses Finkelstein gets off some nice shots: his victim is a “notorious serial prevaricator� and “moral pervert� who “mounts his case from multiple angles, sometimes implicitly, sometimes explicitly, but always falsely.�

Aaah, the sweet art of the ad hominem academic slapdown.

Overall the piece is a lot of fun, and provides some nice ammo for after-dinner arguments. Finkelstein’s comments on civilian culpability and casualties, and the implications of blurring civilian/military distinctions are one high point. Another comes at the very end where, well, he answers the question raised in the title.

In the same vein (readable, consumer level stuff on international law) Philippe Sands’s Lawless World provides a good clear primer on the political/judicial terrain over which Finkelstein and Dershowitz are punching each other’s lights out.

Interview with Gamaa leader

My friend Ahmad al-Khateeb of Al-Masri Al-Youm had a long interview with Dr. Nageh Ibrahim, member of the Gamaa Islamiya’s Shoura Council, and one of the militant group’s historical leaders. Unfortunately I have little time to translate it, but if you can read Arabic, please check it out. Today’s interview will be the first in a series.

On a seperate note, Ahmad is getting married on Wednesday… Mabrouk ya basha! 

Follow-up on Zawahri-Gamaa statement

UPI has an update on the merger between Al Qaeda and the Egyptian Gamaa Islamiya announced by Ayman Zawahri a few days ago. Having now been denied by several former Gamaa leader — including repentant leaders Karam Zohdy and Nagueh Ibrahim in Egypt — it looks like Zawahri’s statement was either a fake or he was rather badly informed. One thing the Egyptian press has picked up over the last few days is that the statement was issued on the day of the funeral of Sadat assassin Khaled al-Islambuli’s father, who is related to Zawahri himself. Zawahri mentioned that Al Islambuli’s brother, Muhammad Shawki al-Islambuli, was one of the former Gamaa leaders who had pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda.

Makram Mohammed Ahmed, a prominent state columnist/editor who was instrumental in the government’s negotiations with the Gamaa Islamiya and broke the story in his magazine, al-Mussawar, several years ago, wrote in al-Ahram recently that the whole thing is an attempt by Zawahri to reclaim some of the limelight stolen by Hizbullah. And, apparently, to divert attention from this, he has announced (and it has been echoed by security sources in other newspapers) that he has begun a dialogue with imprisoned Islamic Jihad leaders. Initial reports suggest that individual members are amenable to the same kind of recantation the Gamaa carried out, but that there are difficulties because of Jihad’s much more cellular structure.

All of this suggests that Zawahri’s recent statement was, overall, a failed and badly thought-out PR coup. I like to think about it as the jihadist equivalent of a bunch of gangta rappers, having found fame and fortune and moved from South Central to Beverly Hills, defensively sing about how they’re “still G” and from the hood. A bunch of ex-Gamaa types who are on the run or in prisons really doesn’t amount to much, much like Zawahri himself (also on the run) struggles to remain in the media’s eye even though he really is old news. Does anyone really think that the people behind, for instance, yesterday’s airplane alert in Britain are taking direct directions from Zawahri, Bin Laden or former Gamaa leaders? Inspiration (sick, twisted inspiration to be sure) is all these old fogeys can provide. A new generation of wars is generating its own jihadists.

Zawahri: Gamaa Islamiya members join Al Qaeda

Ayman Al Zawahri just showed up on Al Jazeera with a tape saying that several members of the Egyptian Gamaa Islamiya had now joined Al Qaeda. Here’s an initial wire report:

AP 05.08.06 | 22h14

Al-Qaida’s No. 2 leader announced in a new videotape aired Saturday that an Egyptian militant group has joined the terror network. The Egyptian group, Gamaa Islamiya, is apparently a revived version of a militant group that waged a campaign of violence in Egypt during the 1990s but had largely been suppressed by a government crackdown. «We announce to the Islamic nation the good news of the unification of a great faction of the knights of the Gamaa Islamiya … with the Al-Qaida group,» Ayman al-Zawahri, the deputy leader of al-Qaida said in the videotape aired on the Al-Jazeera news network.

While it’s not clear what the immediate significance of this in terms of Al Qaeda’s operational abilities, it is quite a momentous even from an Egyptian perspective. Firstly, it casts a shadow over the decade-long process of re-integration of former Gamaa Islamiya militants, starting with the public recantation of a good deal of the imprisoned leadership and the release of hundreds of prisoners.

Secondly, on a symbolic level it marks the reunificaiton of the Gamaa Islamiya and Islamic Jihad, groups that parted over method in the late 1970s and went on two different paths: a popular militant movement borne out of universities in Upper Egypt in the 1970s and 1980s that originally had government backing before it turned terrorists/insurrectionist for Gamaa Islamiya; and a cell-structured highly secretive group that carried out political assassinations as well as terror attacks for Islamic Jihad.

Islamic Jihad now only exists (aside potential sleeper agents) as Al Qaeda since Zawahri teamed up with Bin Laden in the 1990s; Gamaa Islamiya was on its way towards social reintegration (former member Montasser Al Zayat, a prominent lawyer, was a parliamentary election candidate in 2005). Tonight’s announcement spells out the possibility of a dissident wing of Gamaa Islamiya that had refused the recantation of the prison leadership (actually we know there are several dissident wings) joining Al Qaeda, and possibly making use of old networks in Egypt. So how worried should we be?

Probably not too much. The exiled Gamaa Islamiya leadership in Europe and elsewhere did not have mass appeal, indeed post-9/11 it became very difficult for it to do anything at all — especially after Londonistan began to be closed down. We will probably see in the next few days a statement by the imprisoned leadership condemning their old comrades and reiterating the recantation orchestrated by the Egyptian security services in the late 1970s.

I just spoke to Arabist contributor Hossam al-Hamalawy, who follows Islamist movements closely and has worked on rendition issues for human rights groups (read this article by him for background on the recantation). Hossam saw the Zawahri video, which I missed, he remembers three names mentioned by Zawahri:

1. Mohammed Shakwi al-Islambuli, the brother of Sadat assassin Khaled al-Islambuli, who lived in Iran (where his brother is a hero) at least until 9/11 and has been on the record for being against the imprisoned leadership’s recantation.

2. Mustafa al-Murq’, alias Abu Issar, who was based in London and was famously against the Algerian FIS’ killing of civilians. He also operated many of the Gamaa Islamiya’s outpost in Afghanistan during the Afghan civil war.

3. Most strangely, Rifai Ahmed Taha, who is believed to have been rendered from Syria to Egypt in 2001 and in prison ever since (although some believe he was executed.) Taha was known as the Gamaa’s “military commander” has also spent time in Afghanistan, and was even reported in 1998 to have signed the founding charter of Al Qaeda (which would mean he was already operating under Al Qaeda’s aegis.) Taha has reportedly received visits from his family in prison, but some say he was also heavily tortured. There is virtually no way he would have agreed to this while in prison, since he’d be signing his own death warrant.

What all this points to is that it’s unlikely to be more than a publicity stunt by a once major militant Islamist group that is now for the most part irrelevant in the world of Jihadis. As for membership of Al Qaeda, beyond allegiance to “Emir” Osama, it probably doesn’t mean any real operational co-ordination but following Al Qaeda’s general guidelines and stances on current events as highlighted in these kinds of tapes.

More on this tomorrow.

Related:
Egypt group leaders join al Qaeda: Zawahri video (WaPo)
Al-Qaida welcomes new Egyptian group (AP)
Gamaa vets go free (Arabist April 2006)
More Gamaa Islamiya members freed (Arabist November 2004)
Gamaa Islamiya (Wikepedia)

Proposed terror detainee bill rings bells

It seems the democratization domino effect Bush expected following the War on Iraq is working the other way around. The US is increasingly inspired by its Arab “allies.” Bush’s proposed detainee bill is a worrying development for anyone who cares about civil liberties. It sounds a bit like the Egyptian emergency law…

Bush submits new terror detainee bill
By ANNE PLUMMER FLAHERTY
Fri Jul 28, 6:53 PM ET

(AP) U.S. citizens suspected of terror ties might be detained indefinitely and barred from access to civilian courts under legislation proposed by the Bush administration, say legal experts reviewing an early version of the bill.

Continue reading Proposed terror detainee bill rings bells

Afghanistan “close to chaos,” warns NATO general

I haven’t been keeping an eye on the situation in Afghanistan for sometime, since the start of the so called Taliban’s spring offensive (the crackdown on the pro-judges movement in Cairo was then escalating), but I came across this Guardian report today. It’s quoting Lt. General David Richards, head of Nato’s international security force in Afghanistan, warning the country was “close to chaos.â€�

It’s kinda interesting when you suddently get senior military or government officials talking frankly about how bleak the situation under their control is. Make no mistake the general’s assessment is largely correct and the situation in Afghanistan in so many ways is going down the drains, but i was just curious why General Richards is so public about it. But may be one reason is general’s complaint about “western forces there were short of equipmentâ€�… Going to the press always helps when officials are about to ask for increase in budget?

Continue reading Afghanistan “close to chaos,” warns NATO general